HIFICRITIC audio review magazine
HIFICRITIC FORUMS
New Issue: Vol 4, No 3
HIFICRITIC
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Next issue forecast Options · View
HansW
Posted: Monday, March 15, 2010 6:30:51 PM

Rank: HIFI Addict
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/18/2008
Posts: 35
Location: Stockholm
I liked the last issue very much. The 'Upcoming' section looks exiting. When can we expoct the next issue?

Hans
hifistan
Posted: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 3:46:21 AM

Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/18/2008
Posts: 330
Location: Indiana, USA
we are running late with a great roster of features and products

we hope to finish setting very soon and print early in the 3rd week March for urgent dispatch

All is written and editorial subbing completed!

thanks for your patience


MartinC

I posted this omitting the quotation marks, leading to an inquiry whether I was Martin Colloms. No, there is only one MC; my bad.
HansW
Posted: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 8:16:06 AM

Rank: HIFI Addict
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/18/2008
Posts: 35
Location: Stockholm
Thank you for tour response. I am looking forward to it.

Hans
hifi addict
Posted: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:09:43 PM


Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/26/2008
Posts: 277
Location: Hasting/Crete/London
No! I'm Martin Colloms!Flapper
Martin Colloms
Posted: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 5:58:28 PM

Rank: Administrator
Groups: Administration , Member

Joined: 7/15/2008
Posts: 832
we have printed vol4 no 1, mail list is set , should be going out very soon ..........

see site for contents, editorial and some excerpts

Martin C
Martin Colloms
Posted: Monday, April 05, 2010 9:50:18 AM

Rank: Administrator
Groups: Administration , Member

Joined: 7/15/2008
Posts: 832
Better,

all printed last week including mail out , plus the usual; postal delays

sorry to all about the delay, stuff comes in late and then there were this time understandable time losses due to time off for surgery etc (not myself).

We will work hard to try and catch up a bit for the next issue while the Continuum Criterion /Copperhead turntable has already arrived and has been installed and calibrated. We will use Superline-Supercap ARC REF2 Koetsu Urushis Sky Blue and Vermillion
for the evaluations.

MartinC

hifi addict
Posted: Thursday, April 08, 2010 9:26:01 PM


Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/26/2008
Posts: 277
Location: Hasting/Crete/London
Got my copy today. I like the cable test. I don't think many magazines would be able to organise and evaluate such an array. Well Done Martin.
frank23
Posted: Thursday, April 08, 2010 9:53:19 PM

Rank: HIFI Novice
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/12/2009
Posts: 83
Location: the netherlands
Martin Colloms wrote:
we have printed vol4 no 1, mail list is set , should be going out very soon ..........

see site for contents, editorial and some excerpts

Martin C


I received it today. Great issue! Always interesting reading.

The mentioned URL for the graphs (www.hificritic.com/RFicable-graphs) does not seem to work yet though, I'd like to be able to see fig 20a/b for comparison.
darkmatter
Posted: Thursday, April 08, 2010 10:12:09 PM


Rank: Administrator
Groups: Administration , Member, Moderator

Joined: 9/19/2008
Posts: 1,158
Location: UK
Mine landed on the mat this morning, my congrats to the team BigGrin

"Quicquid Nitet Notandum"
malteser
Posted: Friday, April 09, 2010 3:36:21 PM


Rank: HIFI Addict
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/15/2009
Posts: 117
Location: Berkshire, UK
Got it yesterday. Not had a chance to read it yet, but read the bit about listening analytically vs musically and found that to be a very well written and informative piece. I've often had to use very similar wording to try to get a customer to relax and try to connect with the music - and then find out which piece of kit makes him/her connect more.

Regards,
Frank.

All opinions are my own and do not reflect the opinion of any organisations I work for, except where this is stated explicitly.
hifistan
Posted: Friday, April 09, 2010 4:36:04 PM

Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/18/2008
Posts: 330
Location: Indiana, USA
malteser wrote:
Got it yesterday. Not had a chance to read it yet, but read the bit about listening analytically vs musically and found that to be a very well written and informative piece. I've often had to use very similar wording to try to get a customer to relax and try to connect with the music - and then find out which piece of kit makes him/her connect more.


I look forward to reading this, not 10 minutes ago I had decided to post something on DBT vs Holistic Listening and why I do not care about the former for my own use. I am not interested in analyzing the DIFFERENCES between different set ups or components but in which one appeals to me as a more natural presentation of the music. How do I judge this? When I can understand more of the lyrics , hear instruments I did not hear before or listen straight through a recording instead of skipping through it [CD] or taking it off [LP] I think I have made some kind of improvement. Sometimes I will try to analyze exactly why the change occurred but since I am neither a manufacture nor a reviewer it is not really critical that I know EXACTLY what is going on. I find that when two of my friends and I listen to music we usually agree on differences in sound but often disagree on preference. I can not speak for how they listen but I find consciously trying to listen very carefully to be tiring and not helpful. What I try to do is to put my consciousness in neutral, as it were, and experience the music without analyzing it with the conscious part of my mind. Our mind is far broader than the part that we are conscious of at any given time and has abilities that we do not access directly. I want to make it clear that I am not using conscious-unconscious as a rational-irrational dichotomy but as a part-whole distinction, out unconscious mind can be as rational as our conscious one and has greater capabilities. So I find that not trying to THINK about the music but trying to EXPERIENCE it as directly as possible gives me not only the most pleasure but in the end the most information.
malteser
Posted: Friday, April 09, 2010 7:37:06 PM


Rank: HIFI Addict
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/15/2009
Posts: 117
Location: Berkshire, UK
That's exactly what we try so hard to get people to do. Of course, people being people the less experienced ones come in determined to identify and analyse the differences, rather than to enjoy themselves, because "it's an important - or expensive - purchase". We have a lot of work to deal with when we're faced with that approach.

Oh - and Martin fyi, saw your thing on IEC cables and forgot to mention that the ISIS/Osiris IEC cable comes with the braid connected at both ends. Our tests have shown us that the musical flow is better when the braid is not connected at the IEC end. Not sure why this is (no measurements taken), but it works. Might like to try it? Obviously it's not something sanctioned by Rega...

Regards,
Frank.

All opinions are my own and do not reflect the opinion of any organisations I work for, except where this is stated explicitly.
mat
Posted: Thursday, April 15, 2010 12:35:16 PM

Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/12/2008
Posts: 312
mine hasn't arrived yet, has everyone else got theirs?

mat
hifi addict
Posted: Thursday, April 15, 2010 4:19:47 PM


Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/26/2008
Posts: 277
Location: Hasting/Crete/London
Got mine last week.
HansW
Posted: Thursday, April 15, 2010 10:24:21 PM

Rank: HIFI Addict
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/18/2008
Posts: 35
Location: Stockholm
Mine arrived a week ago. Very good read as usual.

A quick question to Martin C. In the Naim DAC review you stated that you tried it with four transports but the CDX2.2 wasn't ranked among the rest. Does this mean that it was the worst of the four in sound quality?

Hans
Togil
Posted: Saturday, April 17, 2010 11:47:57 AM

Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/4/2008
Posts: 228
Location: Oxford
Regarding the AR Ref 5 review , how does it compare to a Paganini digital volume control ?

Hans
Martin Colloms
Posted: Monday, April 19, 2010 11:20:32 AM

Rank: Administrator
Groups: Administration , Member

Joined: 7/15/2008
Posts: 832
malteser wrote:
That's exactly what we try so hard to get people to do. Of course, people being people the less experienced ones come in determined to identify and analyse the differences, rather than to enjoy themselves, because "it's an important - or expensive - purchase". We have a lot of work to deal with when we're faced with that approach.

Oh - and Martin fyi, saw your thing on IEC cables and forgot to mention that the ISIS/Osiris IEC cable comes with the braid connected at both ends. Our tests have shown us that the musical flow is better when the braid is not connected at the IEC end. Not sure why this is (no measurements taken), but it works. Might like to try it? Obviously it's not something sanctioned by Rega...


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This RFI thing is really complex as the equivalent circuits are not well understood and the relationship is different for each product and install.

For audio , one in shield ground is normal but for studios double ended grounding is recommended for everything even if there is an audio fidelity consequence.

The Rega cable is a full three conductor product so if terminated well, connect the auxiliary screen where it sounds best.

MartinC
Martin Colloms
Posted: Monday, April 19, 2010 11:22:00 AM

Rank: Administrator
Groups: Administration , Member

Joined: 7/15/2008
Posts: 832
HansW wrote:
Mine arrived a week ago. Very good read as usual.

A quick question to Martin C. In the Naim DAC review you stated that you tried it with four transports but the CDX2.2 wasn't ranked among the rest. Does this mean that it was the worst of the four in sound quality?

Hans



The transport issue will be in the X2 report in vol4 no 2 . It is a good transport

MartinC
Martin Colloms
Posted: Monday, April 19, 2010 11:24:05 AM

Rank: Administrator
Groups: Administration , Member

Joined: 7/15/2008
Posts: 832
Togil wrote:
Regarding the AR Ref 5 review , how does it compare to a Paganini digital volume control ?



Wow this is a tough one ............

not the same comparison

I would estimate that the hard wired on board Paganini digital control beats the externally connected ARC 5 , or any external pre for that matter.

MartinC
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

SoClean Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/29/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.129 seconds.