HIFICRITIC audio review magazine
HIFICRITIC FORUMS
New Issue: Vol 7, No 1
HIFICRITIC
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

3 Pages<123>
Togil Offline
#21 Posted : 24 May 2012 20:34:10(UTC)
Togil


Rank: HIFI Veteran

Joined: 04/10/2008(UTC)
Posts: 535
Location: Oxford


Pity there isn't a high-speed transfer by laser tracking - should be technically possible but probably not worth it.
Hans
doomlord_uk User is suspended until 22/04/4750 08:53:41(UTC)
#22 Posted : 25 May 2012 06:34:56(UTC)
doomlord_uk


Rank: HIFI Novice

Joined: 20/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 38
United Kingdom

Originally Posted by: Pete_w Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: doomlord_uk Go to Quoted Post
Quote:
Shame we can't do the same thing for the vinyl, really; there's huge amounts of music there that we liked once and that we never listen to...

Rip it :) To 24/192 if you like.


Thought briefly about that. But it's the time. And the supervision. And typing in the metadata. And the wear on the cartridge. If I could find an hour a day to do it - one disk, basically - that'd be 3 years to do the set, if I did it every single day... And I suspect I'd find myself divorced first :-(


Would it be worth paying someone to do it for you?

Pete_w Offline
#23 Posted : 26 May 2012 20:14:04(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Made some interesting discoveries over the last couple of days. Shows how frustrating this hobby can be when what you think you're chasing turns out to be your own tail. The joys of network audio. I'll type it up here so that Google will find it and maybe present it to anyone else having the same problem.

So I've been feeding this trial Arcam D33 DAC from my recently acquired Squeezebox Touch, using losslessly ripped CD material. Many admirable qualities, this DAC, but slight reservations remaining about its ability to convincingly portray timing.

So, yesterday afternoon, I did some dismantling and hooked up the old Linn Ikemi as a transport, connected over balanced AES connection (because that's the cable I happen to have...). Oh, very interesting, timing suddenly improves, much more rhythmic drive. In my opinion. Call my wife, do an A/B with her and say "isn't this better?". "No," she says, "the air and space round the voice has gone, preferred the other one". Repeat a few times, different tracks, same maritally split opinion. One in the eye for the objectivists who say that DBTs are the panacea. Anyway, moving on...

So I was a bit depressed by this. Surely in 2012 it's possible to design a DAC whose performance isn't messed up by the SPDIF feed, which is identical in both cases. Ken would certainly say so. Turns out that this quick and easy conclusion - that some mystical quality of the drives is messing the DAC up - isn't true, and that there's an explanation.

Chatted to a friend, he questioned my rips. They were done on the PC in iTunes, using the "reliable" rip option, and stored as ALAC - Apple Lossless - as that's the only lossless codec that iTunes provides. Friend suggested I try a ripper called EAC, and rip to FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec) or just WAV. So I downloaded and installed that and ripped some of the tracks that were causing such consternation yesterday, to both WAV and FLAC.

Played those on the Squeezebox/DAC, and they're fine. They're audibly better than my ALAC rips. So what the <beep> is going on?

Turns out - hello Google search engine, are you listening - that the Squeezecenter server-side software reads the data off disk, and if it's in a compressed format that the client - the squeezebox touch - supports, then forwards it on. If it's uncompressed, or in an unsupported format, then it transcodes it on the server into a supported (and losslessly compressed) format for transmission to the client.

So my FLAC rips are being transmitted as-is to the client, my WAV rips are compressed using FLAC and sent, and my ALAC rips are expanded to full-size and then FLAC encoded for transmission. Something is clearly going audibly astray in that expansion & recompression of the ALAC. Without a PCM analyser (and an engineer from Arcam to drive it and get any useful debug info out of the DAC) on hand, it's not possible for me to say more. I could speculate about things like packet burstiness, but it may simply be a software bug in the squeezecenter transcoding.

So, do I have to re-rip 5000 tracks using EAC? No, thank the lord...

Turns out that the Squeezecenter server has configurable behaviour - in the Settings part of the web interface, go to Advanced, then File Types, and you can select the transcoding path from each file type to what gets transmitted to the client.

So, under Apple Lossless, FLAC and WAV - my three current file types - I've disabled everything except PCM. This forces the server to expand FLAC and ALAC to full size, and transmit them uncompressed. It does indeed do this, I can see the network traffic doubling on the Windows perfmeter.

The server's ALAC uncompression clearly works fine - with this regime, the 3 file types are now, as they should be, impossible for me to tell apart with any certainty.

The reason that Squeezecenter does this, of course, is to cut network bandwidth so that a Wifi link to the client stands a chance of working. I have a 100Mbit/s wired network, so a full-CD-bandwidth link - 1.4Mbit/s - is not an issue. But my point is that the configuration I was using is more or less the out-of-the-box one, and the woeful lack of up to date documentation around the whole "squeeze" product means that unless you're an inquisitive geek, you're simply not going to work this one out... Hence my writing this down here. Whether other streaming systems have similar limitations/options is left as an exercise for the reader...

Incidentally, while I was googling around to try to work out what was happening, I found some disinformation in Linn's website. This article starts to say that you can use a Linn DS streamer as a client to Squeezecenter, but it states - seemingly definitively - that all data is transcoded to MP3 between Squeezecenter and client. As I've just implied above, that's not true - dear old Ivor T would probably use a word beginning with B - the user seems to be able to configure Squeezecenter to use one or more of many different formats. MP3 is an option, certainly, but not one you need to use...






Pete_w Offline
#24 Posted : 29 May 2012 22:21:54(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
It's about time I wrote something about this DAC. We've had it on loan for 7 days now, so that's 168 hours of playing; it's been left playing 24/7.

I feel very much as if I'm setting a hostage to fortune; with Martin saying he's going to pontificate on it soon, I risk having mud all over my face. However, having gone on record in another thread here recently as saying we should trust our own ears, here goes...

I was worried on several counts when we started. Would our not-very-high-end-at-all (by the standards of HFC) kit even let us hear the difference between old sources and this DAC? Would hi-res be wasted on us? Would it all sound sterile and "hifi"? Would the out-of-band content (musical or filter-related spuriae) play havoc with my amps? Would a piece of kit from Arcam (sorry, but I'll admit I do carry prejudice about them from the past as being somehow "second-tier", and have never considered buying anything from them before) ever be any good and be worth this sort of money? So this DAC had a hill to climb before I even turned it on...

Wrong on all counts. Wrong, wrong, wrong. And boy, am I glad to say that!

In a nutshell, this is the most consistently and beguilingly musical source component that we have ever heard in our system. And I include in that assessment a large number of the averagely-crap LP pressings that live in our collection (though I'll admit that my old DIY phono stage may be responsible for some of that...).

To use an automotive analogy, it has the kind of unstressed "grunt", the iron-fist-in-velvet-glove feeling, that you get when going up a quality product range from something small-but-fast, with 4 cylinders and a turbocharger, to something with a more adequate number of cylinders and cubic centimetres.

It's agile, it's fast, it communicates timing very well, but it doesn't have any vestige of what I think of as the Krell sound, the "look-at-me-I'm-being-expensive-hifi" sound. It keeps all that hidden behind what could almost be a more valve-like demeanour, and just gets on with communicating the music. It simply doesn't make a fuss. At all. No glare, no shrieking, no sharpness.

Illustrative case: My wife's not a great one for sitting and listening to long tracts of music, she tends to fidget and look for something to hold her attention. She's also not a great fan of June Tabor. So I was playing JT this morning, my wife was sat on the sofa, and I realised she was (a) utterly lost in the music and (b) had tears rolling down her face. I think that ticks the "communication" box quite nicely. The track was Les Barker's "Sudden Waves", from Angel Tiger.

We have thrown all sorts of music at it over the last few days, some of the best-recorded and some of the worst in our collection. The best sounds divine, the worst is at least rendered tolerable, it's not torn to shreds.

Some examples:

- Up close and personal with John Lee Hooker in Dark Room, in an ad-hoc "field" recording of a solo gig at a uni in the 1970s, you sit with the audience, being slightly annoyed at their chatting as the song starts, and are swept up along with them until, at the song's end, you could hear a pin drop. And you follow the song perfectly, I've learned that this track is a timing torture test and the D33 navigates it with ease.

- Rusted Root's anthemic "All I want is Food and Creative Love" bounces infectiously around the room, the slight strains very audible in the tempo as the various band members don't seem to be quite sure when they agreed that they'd change gear...

- Jennifer Warnes' Way Down Deep just makes you fall in love with her; John Martyn's Solid Air is genius.

I could go on, but it's late.

Bass lines are rendered far better than I've heard before. String bass notes start and stop with aplomb, synthesised bass lines slam out of the speakers in a way that I simply didn't believe that the MartinLogans were capable of. A couple of examples of comedy "dub" bass today have been Moby's Jam For The Ladies, and Benjamin Zephaniah & Eliza Carthy reworking Tam Lin for The Imagined Village. I know it's a cliche to say that an extra octave turned up, but it did; and the power down there is astonishing.

Further up the frequency range, I've no complaint with male voices at all. Female voices, and instruments in the same sort of area - clarinet, harmonica - are perhaps pushed a shade further back in the mix than the perhaps over-bold presentation that I'm used to.

A new album turned up from Amazon this morning - Melody Gardot's The Absence. Normally, with new albums, we tend to stick them in the car for a while so we "get used" to them and see if we like them. Odd, but there you go. Anyway, I just ripped this one and stuck it on loud. Wow. Brand new, unknown music, and the D33 sold it to us, first play. No ifs or buts, we just sat there for the whole album, got to the end, looked at each other and said "that's good!".

The main thing that we haven't yet played with is the switchable digital filters. The word (via the dealer) from the Arcam rep was that I'd probably end up using it with the default filter - that is, good stop-band performance but with plenty of ringing. Keith Howard in his HFN review preferred Filter 2 - lousy stop-band performance but no pre-ringing, minimal post-ringing and fairly clean phase. Haven't played much, but so far I'm with Keith on Filter 2. Tried the default filter a couple of times much earlier in the run-in process, and each time I lost interest in the track before it had finished! F2 seems to deliver better timing, a more urgent and coherent performance. In our system at least - playing with phase and stop-band performance is going to be horribly system-dependent.

(I'm coming to the conclusion that Keith Howard and I seem to have a similar set of musical "values". I'm with him on coherent single-driver speakers, and now I appear to be on the same page as regards these filters...). Anyway...

So, what of hi-res, then? Would I hear the difference? Oh yes, at least once I'd persuaded the Squeezebox that I really didn't mind it streaming 5Mbit/s over the house network (see earlier post). I don't own any HD material, so I've just been playing with freebie samplers. Gwyneth Herbert is an artist I haven't heard before, but "Perfect Fit" is a 24/44.1 free download from Naim and sounds better than I've heard a CD sound before. A 10-minute Mozart track (at 24/96) from 2L is just amazing, I was swept away not just by the detailing but by the pulse and the general "humanity", if I can put it that way, of the music.

So there we are, we like it! Others may differ. You'll notice an absence of terms like soundstage, or stage depth, or that sort of thing. What we value above all is the ability to communicate musical intent. I want to be swept up into, and lost in, the music; not distracted from it by details. That's not to say the D33 isn't detailed - I think it is - but it's putting the detail into the service of the music, not highlighting it in order to sound "hifi". Hence the earlier reference to valves!

KH commented in his HFN review that his only potential criticism was that he felt that the DAC sometimes pulled its punches when asked to deliver "extremes", in favour of a more even-handed approach. I can see what he means, I think, but if pulling the occasional punch on some extremely dynamic "audiophile" material means that the rest of our music collection is rendered listenable, that's a price I'll pay. The DAC's tonality certainly strikes me as "warm" and embracing, but it seems to me that that's being achieved via an absence of "cold" nasties rather than via any deliberate policy of warming...

For reference, the system surrounding this D33 is:

- Digital sources are mostly Squeezebox Touch (doing PCM streaming as per previous post) over digital co-ax with occasional use of Linn Ikemi over AES/EBU.

- Power to D33 supplied by PS Power Plant Premier, itself fed from an Isol8 G2 minisub.

- D33 connected over balanced VdH The Second to Music First transformer passive pre-amp

- MF pre-amp connected single-ended (using pseudo-balanced silver-on-copper cable) to a pair of 400W mono switching amps

- MartinLogan Ascent speakers, stators powered from the PS PPP.

- 6x6m room, sofa 4m or so from speakers, a completely uncalibrated iPhone app says that SPL peaks are around 99dB at the sofa.

That's about it. Back soon when I've played with filters, mains supplies (may as well...) and also tried hooking it up to the TV and BD player...

Feedback welcome. Please. I haven't heard other high-end DACs at home. Am I about to make an expensive mistake...?

Martin Colloms Offline
#25 Posted : 30 May 2012 06:17:24(UTC)
Martin Colloms


Rank: Administrator

Joined: 15/07/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,840

Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 8 post(s)
you have fallen in love ...........

happens many times during reviews , a dangerous time to write the report

then you cool off , stand back , compare and contrast,

get a second opinion

finally it works out

conclusion time comes , you ponder , think of the competition

and out pops the finding

can you recommend it , and why

or not ..........

MartinC
Pete_w Offline
#26 Posted : 30 May 2012 08:07:31(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Wise words, Martin, thank you. Yes, the two of us have fallen in love with it; there's an argument that that may not be a bad thing for something that we'll have to live with for longer than some marriages, but that's for another day... :-)

Compare and Contrast is the hard part. I've asked here a couple of times what else I should be listening to, and haven't really had any answers. MSB, DCS, etc are too expensive. The Metrum has limited connectivity and anyway is a buy-before-you-try deal, which I'm not happy with. I've never been a huge fan of the "Naim sound" and anyway they'll soon want to sell me another £2k box in the shape of a power supply... What else is there...? The restrictions imposed by my disabled son mean that I basically need regular-shaped boxes that go in slots on a wall, nothing with exposed valves or significant heat output is possible, which rules out kit like the Lector stuff which I've loved the sound of in the past - again, that organic sound :-).

Those who live in or near large metropolises may find this easier, but here north of Cambridge - an affluent Uni and hi-tech town of 100k+ souls, as unaffected as anywhere in the country by the recession - there's no dealer that stocks this sort of stuff. The local dealer, whom I've dealt with for years, now stocks much more multi-room and home cinema stuff than he does 2-channel, and does a lot of custom install work, presumably 'cos that's where the money is. He's dropped his Absolute Sounds franchise because it wasn't viable. The county's other major town, Peterborough, is deep in recession and there's no significant hifi dealer there that I'm aware of; so that's pretty much it for Cambridgeshire.

I'll see how much longer I can keep the D33 for... :-)
Togil Offline
#27 Posted : 30 May 2012 08:21:42(UTC)
Togil


Rank: HIFI Veteran

Joined: 04/10/2008(UTC)
Posts: 535
Location: Oxford



Contrast this with my university days when there was a dealer ( Cambridge Audio ?) in the market square where I first heard the stunning sound from the early wedge-shaped Nakamichi deck through LS3/5As, I'll never forget that .
Hans
Pete_w Offline
#28 Posted : 30 May 2012 09:52:22(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
I know! I think that the one on the market square was University Audio, wasn't it? Cambridge Audio was somewhere up Chesterton, unless I'm imagining it. I used to go to a chap - Pete Moulton, if I recall correctly - who ran Cam Audio on Mill Road, then there was Steve Boxhall up Victoria Road as well. All now gone. Cam Audio became a fruit & veg shop. When Steve Boxhall shut up shop, the premises were taken by Bev Reynolds from The Audio File in Bishop's Stortford, who expanded her empire up here in collaboration with a local chap (ex-sound engineer) named Steve Streater. I have no idea what the commercial relationships (if any) now are, but The Audio File, owned by Steve, now relocated to Mitcham's Corner, remains our only hifi dealer, as far as I know...
malteser Offline
#29 Posted : 30 May 2012 14:03:19(UTC)
malteser


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 15/05/2009(UTC)
Posts: 350
Location: Berkshire, UK

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
As I said, it's a good DAC! However, given your focus on timing, I think it'd be a mistake to rule out the Naim DAC without giving it a whirl. The modern Naim sound is far more forgiving than in the past and it swings very well indeed. And nobody's holding a gun to your head saying you need to upgrade it, but you can if you want to. The only thing that gives me pause here is that the Naim has single ended output only (RCA and DIN), but since the Music First is likely only wired as pseudo balanced anyway that should not make a difference. Then again, the Naim has 8 inputs which could be handy.

I suspect you may still prefer the Arcam - it's probably just more up your street, but you never know...

BTW, thanks for your findings on the ALAC/FLAC/WAV options. That was VERY interesting.

Edited by user 30 May 2012 14:03:58(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Regards,
Frank.

All opinions are my own and do not reflect the opinion of any organisations I work for, except where this is stated explicitly.
Pete_w Offline
#30 Posted : 30 May 2012 20:33:28(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Originally Posted by: malteser Go to Quoted Post
BTW, thanks for your findings on the ALAC/FLAC/WAV options. That was VERY interesting.


Yes, I think that if nothing else at all useful has come out of this thread - and it probably hasn't - then that streaming config setup "tweak" - if that's the right word - was worthwhile.

Have extended D33 dem into next week, and have arranged for a friend to come and act as 3rd set of ears (and bring his old Meridian G08 to give us a fixed point) over the weekend...

Rigged up my first ever direct digital feed from a Blu-ray player to this DAC this afternoon (I have a very nice TV, bought "off the wall" at the branch of Sevenoaks in Peterborough as it was closing down...) but I'm not a 5.1 home cinema buff...). Cor! I suspect that's more a "cor!" at what I've been missing in general, rather than at the D33 in particular, but still, very very nice...

Pete_w Offline
#31 Posted : 04 June 2012 18:32:47(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
OK, just to update this thread. My friend and his wife came over for dinner last night, bringing a Meridian G08 and a little rDAC that he uses for Spotify. We tried a lot of things, last night and for most of today; I'm just going to type them up here in the hope that they make more sense to me after I've done so; it's a way to organise my thoughts.

What a mess!

So what did we learn? We used the rDAC as a sanity check and it is frankly outclassed. It's nice enough in its own way, and this result is not a surprise, but it did at least prove we're not deaf.

Also outclassed is the Ikemi as a standalone CD player. Musical, times well, but at the end of the day it's a 13+ year old design (with an early Linn SMPS) and it shows.

The D33, fed by squeezebox, and playing through its balanced outputs, is clearly better at 16/44 material than the G08 playing through its single-ended outputs. We didn't have any top-class single-ended cables to hand, but the differences seemed larger than would be accounted for by cable changes.

The D33 as a 16/44 DAC, however, is NOT clearly better than the G08 when it is also working balanced, into my system. On "audiophile" tracks, the D33 is a bit better, the subjective noise floor is somehow lower and darker, but with more typical listening material, it was hard to consistently choose a musical winner. It varied from track to track, the differences were certainly no greater than those between the D33's filter options. My friend and I thought that, on balance, we probably preferred the D33; our wives, dipping in and out with practised ears but disinterest in the technology, weren't able to call the winner with any consistency at all on this sort of material, whereas they had been able to do so with audiophile material.

Last night, after a few drinks, we'd tried the D33 as DAC with the three available digital transports - the Ikemi, the G08, and the Squeezebox. We felt we established a clear hierarchy - Ikemi at the bottom, G08 and SQB much closer but with SQB the winner. Today, with the G08 warmed up, we felt that the differences weren't huge but that the G08 is an audibly better transport when driving 16/44 material into the D33. It's deeper, cleaner and sharper; the SQB by comparison is warmer and spacious and more rounded, but not ultimately as good. Pressing my BD player into service as a 4th transport, we felt it was indistinguishable from the SQB. So, SQB and BD are good transports, the G08 is better. I don't much like this conclusion. I like even less that when we swapped the digital cables over between G08 and SQB, the differences got smaller. In any sane world the differences shouldn't be there at all, but I have to report what I hear.

So then we played some hi-res material, sourced both over SPDIF from SQB, and over USB from my friend's laptop. Clearly a step-up in quality from the 16/44 material, so my amps and speakers are clearly capable of resolving that step, even if any residual differences between two excellent 16/44 performers are starting to be beyond them. Preferred the SPDIF version, but that could as easily be a laptop XP setup issue so wouldn't read too much into that. We also streamed 320kbit/s into the D33 from Spotify from my friend's laptop, what comes out - provided you don't turn it up too loud - is a perfectly reasonable impersonation of music so that's fine for exploring new music or for background.

Edited by user 06 June 2012 19:12:08(UTC)  | Reason: Finally added a correct link to the image

kengale Offline
#32 Posted : 05 June 2012 15:41:08(UTC)
kengale


Rank: HIFI Veteran

Joined: 25/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 981
Location: UK

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Pete_w Go to Quoted Post
The restrictions imposed by my disabled son mean that I basically need regular-shaped boxes that go in slots on a wall, nothing with exposed valves or significant heat output is possible, which rules out kit like the Lector stuff which I've loved the sound of in the past - again, that organic sound :-).



Yes, I cannot understand how such kit remains legally on the market - and certainly not ethically. The CE certification for audio equipment IIRC requires that no part of the case rises above 40degC above ambient, with just a let-out for "indicators". The legislators clearly didn't anticipate that anyone would design a product with a large part of its workings being fragile, hot and carrying potentially lethal voltages outside its "case". There is also a drop-test onto concrete and remaining safe requirement - again only got round because the drop test, again IIRC, is for a level drop, unlike the requirements for mobile equipment which actually require you to drop it at the worst possible angle.

Certainly when I was the Site Product Safety Engineer (on top of my normal duties as a design engineer) for one of my employers I would never have let such kit be designed let alone released on the public market, especially being mindful of changes in the law since the Herald of Free Enterprise disaster, where you can now pick up automatic jail sentences for allowing unjustified risks to public safety. If you look in the product manual (or sometimes on the kit itself) you will see the CE declaration of conformity: the person who signs this is the man who goes to jail when people get hurt - even if the actual design error was by somebody else within the company.

My wife has MS and has had to largely give up cooking because the resultant lack of co-ordination and poor reaction time led to burns and dropping of pans of hot liquids - I can imagine her comments if she had to give up using our entertainment equipment because she might burn or electrocute herself.
Pete_w Offline
#33 Posted : 13 June 2012 12:50:51(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
And so, dear reader, I've just bought it BigGrin

It's still getting better and opening out. And it's introducing me to new music that I didn't know I liked, which is one of the main purposes of a hifi system...

Anyone wanna buy an Ikemi? BigGrin
malteser Offline
#34 Posted : 14 June 2012 15:20:51(UTC)
malteser


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 15/05/2009(UTC)
Posts: 350
Location: Berkshire, UK

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Congratulations Pete. I guess it just wormed its way under your skin...
Regards,
Frank.

All opinions are my own and do not reflect the opinion of any organisations I work for, except where this is stated explicitly.
Pete_w Offline
#35 Posted : 14 June 2012 16:26:01(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
It did :-). Every time I play music, it just invites me in to listen. I neither know nor care whether it's the last word in detail retrieval, but it makes music, which is what matters. 3 weeks later I still think it's pretty damn good, and I still think that the sound is clearing slightly. The weekend spent chopping and changing with the Meridian G08 player was very instructive, and helped to cement my opinions...

It's still all spread out all over the bench, as per my picture further up this post. Just waiting for a second digital cable to arrive - to hook up the BD player - then I can get it all stacked away neatly in a domestically acceptable manner. Those shelves are such a pain in the butt to work with, that I only want to do it once :-(.

ashleym Offline
#36 Posted : 14 June 2012 20:14:12(UTC)
ashleym


Rank: HIFI Veteran

Joined: 02/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 900
Location: uk

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
So all the money you saved on the SB has been spent on the ARCam!!

Good to hear it is all going so well.
Pete_w Offline
#37 Posted : 14 June 2012 20:47:30(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
It costs a lot more than the £130 that I saved on the Squeezebox. :-)

But I have to say that, coming from a CD player where you have to physically get up, walk across the room, and stare at a rack of CDs for inspiration, then play a whole CD, to a world where I have access to 15 x 24h days' worth of music, track at a time, at my fingertips, has pretty much revolutionised the way that I "consume" music. I've also ripped all of the samplers that I've accumulated over the years (not good at throwing things out...) so with the random shuffle function I'm hearing lots of stuff that I've never heard before and, frankly, never would have. So I can and do play whole albums, I like to sink into an artist's work, but the random-shuffle-as-background is just fabulous.

And the DAC itself is great. Yes, the SBT probably isn't the greatest streamer in the world (the G08 was certainly better), but it's good enough for the DAC to strut most of its stuff, and it just plays and "sells" music. From Sisters Of Mercy to Bebel Gilberto, from Jan Garbarek with the Hilliard Ensemble through to Led Zep's live How The West Was Won, it just gets on with it. Well chuffed!
Richard Baguley Offline
#38 Posted : 21 June 2012 16:51:50(UTC)
Richard Baguley


Rank: HIFI Novice

Joined: 08/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 55
Location: Norfolk, UK

Absolutely fascinating, Pete.

I've just bought a SBT. It will eventually be used for streaming but my main complaint is how darned difficult it is to use compared to my Roberts Stream 83i. Adding internet radio stations on the 83i is quick and simple with useful functionality (last listened etc.). SBT is a nightmare. But it sounds better!

Secondly, why don't Logitech allow WMP as the server? I don't really want to download the SB server software to stream music off the HD but I have to. Nuts.

I wonder how difficult it will be to start streaming (Roberts was virtually instant).

Then do I go NAS or just add a large portable HD to the PC and do I buy a good DAC?!
Martin Colloms Offline
#39 Posted : 21 June 2012 17:58:00(UTC)
Martin Colloms


Rank: Administrator

Joined: 15/07/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,840

Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 8 post(s)
Our experience is that a NAS , and not connected to a computer is the best sounding

only connect to the computer for housekeeping

we found a Qnap NAS with the ARM processor option was a good buy for sound quality
and often HDD beat SSD!

hard wire the NAS to the streamer

Martin Colloms
Richard Baguley Offline
#40 Posted : 21 June 2012 18:01:09(UTC)
Richard Baguley


Rank: HIFI Novice

Joined: 08/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 55
Location: Norfolk, UK

Which Qnap, Martin?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.