HIFICRITIC audio review magazine
HIFICRITIC FORUMS
New Issue: Vol 7, No 1
HIFICRITIC
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

3 Pages123>
Pete_w Offline
#1 Posted : 18 May 2012 08:10:35(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Just wondered if anyone had heard Arcam's new-ish big DAC?

On the face of it, it seems to do what I want - digital electrical (for the squeezebox), optical (for the TV) and AES (for the Ikemi) inputs, and balanced outputs (to save me having to buy yet more expensive cables, as I would with (say) a Naim DAC), and with some inputs left over to handle the BD player if it sounds better than way (rather than via HDMI to TV media box and optical from there). I even found a comment on the "What Hifi" website from a contributor who's plugged it into the back of his Ikemi and loved it, which certainly caught my attention, even if I take What Hifi about as seriously as the Daily Mail...

The reviews I've seen make it sound good. KH in HFN seems to say that ultimately it might be a bit polite, and I'm quite hot on timing, so that may be a factor. On the other hand, KH probably wasn't running it off filtered mains, which is a factor in many reviews...

But anyway, if I have a sudden rush of blood to the head, do y'all reckon it's worth trying to track down a demo unit (ironic, as I live only a few miles up the road from Arcam...)?



Martin Colloms Offline
#2 Posted : 18 May 2012 11:15:07(UTC)
Martin Colloms


Rank: Administrator

Joined: 15/07/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,852

Was thanked: 8 time(s) in 8 post(s)
we pontificate on the DAC quite soon !

MartinC
Pete_w Offline
#3 Posted : 18 May 2012 12:53:53(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Oh, jolly good! Any idea when that issue is due out...?

My feeling is that with this DAC - or indeed with any DACs that allow poor stop-band performance in return for less ringing - there's never going to be an alternative to trying it for oneself, because one can have little idea how the rest of the system is going to react to out-of-band spurii...

Anyway, looking forward to seeing what you say....
malteser Offline
#4 Posted : 18 May 2012 13:30:48(UTC)
malteser


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 15/05/2009(UTC)
Posts: 350
Location: Berkshire, UK

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
We have it because we rate it. Up against the Naim DAC it's a worthy competitor, perhaps not quite as fleet of foot but certainly in the ballpark, and with other strings to its bow. I haven't played with its balanced options which should make a substantial difference since Arcam have implemented that side of it properly. If you're in the market for such a DAC then it should be on your short list.
Regards,
Frank.

All opinions are my own and do not reflect the opinion of any organisations I work for, except where this is stated explicitly.
Pete_w Offline
#5 Posted : 19 May 2012 13:15:49(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Originally Posted by: malteser Go to Quoted Post
If you're in the market for such a DAC then it should be on your short list.


Thank you. Don't know if I am or not, to be honest. Until I've heard what a modern £2k DAC can do in my own system, I won't know if it's worth it to me or not. Have just had a word with my local dealer, he's very enthusiastic about the way it sounds, and is going to try to get hold of one for me to loan...

malteser Offline
#6 Posted : 21 May 2012 13:13:43(UTC)
malteser


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 15/05/2009(UTC)
Posts: 350
Location: Berkshire, UK

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Hmm, that may be difficult. Dealers have to commit to a certain amount of stock to be able to stock the DAC, so it sounds like he hasn't done so. Arcam might acquiesce, but if not you might have to go to another dealer.
Regards,
Frank.

All opinions are my own and do not reflect the opinion of any organisations I work for, except where this is stated explicitly.
Pete_w Offline
#7 Posted : 22 May 2012 15:17:22(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Well, it's here. It was in Arcam's office this morning, on my dealer's sofa at lunchtime, and now it's on my shelf :-).

I won't write too much about first impressions, as I see that Google has found this thread, so I'd probably be doing Arcam a gross dis-service if I commented too much on the sound of a brand spanking new (and stone cold) unit. Suffice to say that the body's nice, but the timing needs to improve. I'll leave it hooked up over spdif to the squeezebox for a few days, playing random shuffle 24/7. And then we'll start to see.

Purite Audio User is suspended until 07/07/2126 05:36:03(UTC)
#8 Posted : 22 May 2012 16:28:04(UTC)
Purite Audio


Rank: HIFI Novice

Joined: 03/04/2009(UTC)
Posts: 83
Location: london

That 'timing' you would think manufacturers would have cracked that by now!
Perhaps you could send Arcam something of yours that 'times' it might help them out?
Keith.
hifistan Offline
#9 Posted : 22 May 2012 17:56:11(UTC)
hifistan


Rank: Administrator

Joined: 18/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 759
Location: Indiana, USA

Was thanked: 5 time(s) in 3 post(s)
From the posts I assume that its price is in the 2000 pound range; that would put it up against the new 8 chip a side Metrum if accounts on another forum are accurate. Nothing on the web site yet about it; anyone have any info on it? May be just the thing for some of my friends who think the Octave is too cheap to consider.
Pete_w Offline
#10 Posted : 22 May 2012 18:46:37(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Purite Audio Go to Quoted Post
That 'timing' you would think manufacturers would have cracked that by now!
Perhaps you could send Arcam something of yours that 'times' it might help them out?
Keith.


Trouble is, burning in kit is expensive for a manufacturer. Better to let the customer do it. Just had a quick listen with 5 hours on it, and there's some improvement already. Will report back next week...
Pete_w Offline
#11 Posted : 22 May 2012 20:22:56(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Originally Posted by: hifistan Go to Quoted Post
From the posts I assume that its price is in the 2000 pound range


Spot on Blushing

I wasn't necessarily looking to spend - OK, I'll rephrase that, I'm a Yorkshireman, a part of England notorious for short arms and long pockets - I certainly wasn't looking to spend £2k. And, I hasten to add, I still haven't spent it, this is a dem :-).

But I have numerous digital sources, and I want to be able to hook them up. Very few people seem to be designing DACs with that sort of "hub" functionality, everyone's just doing a one-in, one-out sort of thing. Oh, and I wanted balanced outputs, otherwise I'd be spending an additional shedload on a new set of interconnect cables (I have balanced VdH carbon cables), so those new cables would have to be factored into the price of a new single-ended DAC, if I buy one.

Rambling off topic: What we've found, in particular, is that the Squeezebox in a few short weeks has completely transformed the way that we're "using" music in day-to-day life - whereas before-SB it was necessary to exert mental effort to work out what we might like to play, whether there's gonna be any tracks on the album we're not gonna like, etc, which generally resulted in our not playing anything at all for casual background, we now just stick it on random shuffle and let it get on with it, no thought required. If a track comes up that we don't like, then either find the remote (or my wife's iPhone!) and skip it, or just grin and bear it, something else'll be along in 3 minutes. The SB now has about 5k tracks to go at (that was tedious!) and we're rediscovering music that we'd entirely forgotten that we had. It's been brilliant, but I just want it to sound a bit better :-)

Shame we can't do the same thing for the vinyl, really; there's huge amounts of music there that we liked once and that we never listen to...


PS: Just turned the volume up for a few minutes and caught it playing Blue Rodeo's Dark Angel, a duet between Blue Rodeo's (male) lead singer and the estimable Sarah McLachlan. Slow and deep and dark and velvety and textured and, above all, (for some reason this word came into my head) chocolate-y. Very nice. So there's definite signs of promise....



ashleym Offline
#12 Posted : 22 May 2012 21:41:23(UTC)
ashleym


Rank: HIFI Veteran

Joined: 02/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 901
Location: uk

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Quote:
Blue Rodeo's Dark Angel


I thought for a moment you said Blue Rondo. Youtube isnt helping me but I imagine the 2 bands are not very similar........Laugh

Just found some Blue Rodeo on their homepage. And yes they are different.......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IV6Pa-r7JE
malteser Offline
#13 Posted : 23 May 2012 16:01:37(UTC)
malteser


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 15/05/2009(UTC)
Posts: 350
Location: Berkshire, UK

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Our experience with the Arcam D33 is that it takes quite some time to run in, and that the main gains are in the timing stakes. It sounds more together after some running in ('some' = 'a good few days').
Regards,
Frank.

All opinions are my own and do not reflect the opinion of any organisations I work for, except where this is stated explicitly.
Purite Audio User is suspended until 07/07/2126 05:36:03(UTC)
#14 Posted : 23 May 2012 16:50:49(UTC)
Purite Audio


Rank: HIFI Novice

Joined: 03/04/2009(UTC)
Posts: 83
Location: london

What a relief, before it is burnt in and times properly ,does it make the tracks too short or too long?
Keith.
Togil Offline
#15 Posted : 23 May 2012 18:24:15(UTC)
Togil


Rank: HIFI Veteran

Joined: 04/10/2008(UTC)
Posts: 538
Location: Oxford


The timing errors may cancel out on average..
Hans
Purite Audio User is suspended until 07/07/2126 05:36:03(UTC)
#16 Posted : 23 May 2012 19:47:28(UTC)
Purite Audio


Rank: HIFI Novice

Joined: 03/04/2009(UTC)
Posts: 83
Location: london

Just as well!
Keith.
Pete_w Offline
#17 Posted : 23 May 2012 20:55:59(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Cynics! I know what I mean :-). Whatever aspect it is of the device's performance that affects its ability to portray the timing - the finger-clicking element - of the music.

24 hours in and it's much improved. It had a good slinky canter though KT Tunstall's Black Horse/Cherry Tree, and barnstormed its way through the last 3 tracks on Springsteen's Live In Dublin album - Saints Go March, This Little Light and American Land. Mind you, I challenge any piece of kit to play those and get them wrong :-). And this is all being fed at 16/44 from the Squeezebox Touch. My wife commented that she's hearing details in songs that she's never heard before - I know it's a tired cliche, but we have looked at each other once or twice and said "Eh? Where did that come from?".

Pulp's Common People - surely a candidate for worst-mastered track of all time - was at least intelligible; ditto Robbie Williams' Feel, though sounding a trifle subdued...

Anyway, the hours continue to mount...

Ashley - yes, having looked at your video, I can see that Blue Rodeo and Blue Rondo aren't quite the same thing!!! I didn't realise that Blue Rodeo are still going; it's odd, I really like the album that we have, it conjures great personal memories of an evening in the Canadian Rockies for us, and yet the experience of it seems complete in and of itself, it's a little nugget of perfection, and I have no desire to go out and buy any more. I'm not a country fan, but, for some reason, that album just works for me. It's called "Five Days in July", a reference (I think) to the recording process, and is a real little gem. The last 3 tracks - Dark Angel, Know Where You Go, Tell Me Your Dream - are as perfect a way of ending an slightly melancholy album as I've ever heard, the absolute opposite of the "big finish". Having Sarah McLachlan on board, on vocals and piano, for those three tracks probably helps, too.
Pete_w Offline
#18 Posted : 24 May 2012 06:12:22(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Occurs to me that everything we've played so far has been 16/44. The Squeezebox should, apparently, be able to stream up to 24/96 natively - it downsamples 192. I have no hi-res material, never been able to play it. Anyone able to point me at a few publically-available samplers? Ideally of some sort of music, as opposed to plinky-plonky "audiophile jazz"? :-)

Thanks!
doomlord_uk User is suspended until 22/04/4750 08:53:41(UTC)
#19 Posted : 24 May 2012 19:14:59(UTC)
doomlord_uk


Rank: HIFI Novice

Joined: 20/04/2012(UTC)
Posts: 38
United Kingdom

Quote:
Shame we can't do the same thing for the vinyl, really; there's huge amounts of music there that we liked once and that we never listen to...

Rip it :) To 24/192 if you like.

I wonder if there could be a viable business renting out a good quality turntable, cartridge, phono stage and ADC to people? Or maybe having a central facility where people could ship their vinyl to be ripped before being shipped back...

Hmmm.
Pete_w Offline
#20 Posted : 24 May 2012 20:24:54(UTC)
Pete_w


Rank: HIFI Guru

Joined: 28/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Cambs, UK

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Originally Posted by: doomlord_uk Go to Quoted Post
Quote:
Shame we can't do the same thing for the vinyl, really; there's huge amounts of music there that we liked once and that we never listen to...

Rip it :) To 24/192 if you like.


Thought briefly about that. But it's the time. And the supervision. And typing in the metadata. And the wear on the cartridge. If I could find an hour a day to do it - one disk, basically - that'd be 3 years to do the set, if I did it every single day... And I suspect I'd find myself divorced first :-(
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.