HIFICRITIC audio review magazine
HIFICRITIC FORUMS
New Issue: Vol 4, No 2
HIFICRITIC
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

HOW DOES A DIY PROJECT GET A PROFESSIONAL OPINION Options · View
visualacoustics
Posted: Monday, March 15, 2010 9:31:17 PM


Rank: HIFI Novice
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/23/2010
Posts: 25
Location: UK/ENFIELD
sorry guys for no replies

have been skiing last week but finally back
i can only go so far in revealing the background & sources involving my product and thats as far as i can go for now.
i would really like to do something at whittlebury but will need some assistance,

one thought is a meeting at the heathrow show coming up, where i can bring the units along to either show on a personal note or even demo after the show if anybody is willing to share their kit/room for an hour or so.

please give me a call if you would like to meet just for a quick chat, its always nice to se who you are talking to face to face

thanks mike



AV HEAVEN DON'T MESS AROUND /SCANSPEAK/ATC/VOLT FRONT END TWIN HAWTHORNE AUGIE 18'' OB ACTIVE SUBS
visualacoustics
Posted: Friday, March 26, 2010 11:31:18 PM


Rank: HIFI Novice
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/23/2010
Posts: 25
Location: UK/ENFIELD
hi all
Thinking of trying atc's 3-way active modules with my project.
The amps incorporate active crossovers and should work well as based around their same mid driver, I can also adjust output levels to the high & mid drivers to even off the response.
Now how cheap can I get the modules-anybody got a pair!!
thanks mike

AV HEAVEN DON'T MESS AROUND /SCANSPEAK/ATC/VOLT FRONT END TWIN HAWTHORNE AUGIE 18'' OB ACTIVE SUBS
Martin Colloms
Posted: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 6:03:57 PM

Rank: Administrator
Groups: Administration , Member

Joined: 7/15/2008
Posts: 831
Sorry

Magazines don't do diy unless it is their own !

Otherwise they would be swamped by stuff that no one could practically hear or buy

DIY is one thing , a professional approach to a manufacturing business, design, build and distribution is essential to get an editor's attention.

The journals are not there to charitably support amateurs , it just cannot be done.

As it is, we are often let down by so called professionals who exhibit at a show once , go for a review and are never seen again.


Sorry again


MartinC
Shadders
Posted: Thursday, April 08, 2010 7:00:23 PM

Rank: HIFI Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/7/2010
Posts: 6
Location: UK
Hi,

There are various DIY suppliers of kits for speakers etc., and Elektor Electronics have previously provided designs on solid state and tube amplifiers, which are available as kits also.

Is it worth any publication reviewing these kits, especially if new and innovative designs such as the Elektor PAX amplifier.

Many kits have been stated as high end, so it would be nice to know how Elektor Electronics (solid state/tube) or Wilmslow Audio Speaker kits compare to the commercial equipment.

I think the UK also needs stimulating with regards to engineering - the closing of some science based faculties in some Universities is of a concern, so any hobby based approach or comparison of kits with commercial equipment would help (recall Hafler were regularly reviewed).

Regards,

Richard.
hifistan
Posted: Friday, April 09, 2010 12:20:43 AM

Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/18/2008
Posts: 329
Location: Indiana, USA
Martin posted the following in response to a similar inquiry by me.

" I agree with Mat


very few kit speakers come anywhere near pro commercial designs though there are some poor commercial speakers out there.

Build for fun and satisfaction. Buy for reliable performance .

Do both , buy a second hand , trusted model such as an old Epos ES11 or a spendor sp2 and keep it as a reference , then have fun designing your own better one, but leave the original alone.

MartinC "
One reason Hafler was reviewed was that they sold more units assembled than as kits. I was one of their dealers for years and don't recall ever selling a kit version. They may even have been a separate franchise, I don't remember.
darkmatter
Posted: Saturday, April 10, 2010 12:06:00 AM


Rank: Administrator
Groups: Administration , Member, Moderator

Joined: 9/19/2008
Posts: 1,158
Location: UK
hifistan wrote:
Martin posted the following in response to a similar inquiry by me.

" I agree with Mat


very few kit speakers come anywhere near pro commercial designs though there are some poor commercial speakers out there.

Build for fun and satisfaction. Buy for reliable performance .

Do both , buy a second hand , trusted model such as an old Epos ES11 or a spendor sp2 and keep it as a reference , then have fun designing your own better one, but leave the original alone.

MartinC "
One reason Hafler was reviewed was that they sold more units assembled than as kits. I was one of their dealers for years and don't recall ever selling a kit version. They may even have been a separate franchise, I don't remember.


Never a truer word of advice given when self building speakers, I have a mint pair of BC1s an SL700 among a few others kept totally original as a balance reference.

In another analogy, if I altered these it would be like repolishing a reference flat and trying to produce an accurate test report for one of my telescope mirrors

Simon.

"Quicquid Nitet Notandum"
Shadders
Posted: Sunday, April 11, 2010 5:05:10 PM

Rank: HIFI Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/7/2010
Posts: 6
Location: UK
Hi,

I built the Richard MacDonald transmission line speakers from early 90's as per the Hifi News and Record Review article - the actual kit came from Wilmslow Audio.

I can see that some kits may be badly designed - but how do we know if they are of a good design. Most construction techniques are well understood and components are available from suppliers, including test software etc., - although perhaps the anechoic chamber (did i spell that right) is not available to most people. So what do the professional companies provide that cannot be replicated to a high degree by kits suppliers or home designer ?.

With regards to solid state amplifiers - or tube amplifiers even, the DIY designs i have seen in electronic magazines are comparable in performance to the industry produced equipment. Again, where does the professional industry differ - same components are used and can be purchased from Digi-Key, Farnell, RS etc. ?. The Audio Precision test results published on the DIY builds are very good.

Regards,

Richard.
Togil
Posted: Sunday, April 11, 2010 6:14:11 PM

Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/4/2008
Posts: 228
Location: Oxford
It seems the best loudspeaker companies make their own drivers or at least heavily modify existing ones.

Hans
kengale
Posted: Sunday, April 11, 2010 7:54:09 PM

Rank: HIFI Veteran
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/25/2008
Posts: 529
Location: UK
Togil wrote:
It seems the best loudspeaker companies make their own drivers or at least heavily modify existing ones.


Realistically it's incredibly hard to match the build quality of an automatic production line - things like RF-curing glues and the associated RF ovens are simply not available to the amateur. It's awfully easy to think that hand-crafting means quality - unfortunately for ones ego it's precisely the opposite. It's the same with electronics - hand building at home can't get anywhere near the precision and consistancy of a good production line. Most of the products I design these days (low-noise amplifiers, DSP-based processors, power amplifiers, high-speed motor controllers etc) don't even have hand-built prototypes: we go straight from the theoretical circuit design to printed-circuit design and manufacture, with the build files going direct to the computer-controlled assembly plant - even for the one-offs for circuit proving and developing. This is far more economic than trying to prove hand-built assemblies, where most of the mistakes turn out to be human assembly errors (dry joints, wrong value components, solder shorts etc) rather than design errors.

The other thing that makes speaker kits poorer value than factory one is the inability to do proper pair-matching and drive-unit matching at home: have a look at some of the reviews of poeple like KEF and B&W and see the comments on the fantastically good pair matching and spectrum flatness they achieve day after day.
Shadders
Posted: Sunday, April 11, 2010 9:06:24 PM

Rank: HIFI Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/7/2010
Posts: 6
Location: UK
Hi,

To reply to Kengale - i see what you mean for loudspeakers.

For the electronics side of things - most people involved in the DIY area will have PCB's manufactured for their project - i use CAD tools for any theoretical work. In reading Hifi News recently, the ATC pre and power amps are hand built - including the components placed and soldered onto the PCB (March 2010 review).

I would expect that popular brands which will sell more than high end systems, hence popular brands will be automated.

Regards,

Richard.
ashleym
Posted: Sunday, April 11, 2010 10:40:25 PM

Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/2/2009
Posts: 267
Location: uk
Shadders,
Dont get too caught up with DIY designs measuring well. Look at the work Douglas Self produces and compare it to Ben Duncan. Both are well published and have very contrasting theories behind their designs. I dont mean they have different versions of Ohms Law! but they have different ideas as to what measurements are important and what design goals are desirable.

So if a DIY designer claims their amp measures well and achieves his aims are they the same as yours? Would they publish a design that didnt measure well? Or are they measure the right things etc etc.
Shadders
Posted: Sunday, April 11, 2010 10:50:30 PM

Rank: HIFI Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/7/2010
Posts: 6
Location: UK
Hi,

OK, thanks. Will examine Ben Duncans work - i recall his pre-amp work from the late 80's or possible early 90's.

I am currently designing a DAC with sample rate converter - using a <1ps jitter clock generator - but having trouble finding a crystal that will produce the relevant frequency that is a multiple of 176.4kHz (44.1kHz multiple) for use with the clock generator. I am planning to use two clock generators - one for CD (44.1kHz) and the other for the USB input providing the usual 192kHz (48kHz multiple clock).

Regards,

Richard.
Togil
Posted: Monday, April 12, 2010 8:58:58 AM

Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/4/2008
Posts: 228
Location: Oxford
dCS claim many thousands of coding hours spent on the development of their dacs.

Hans
hifistan
Posted: Monday, April 12, 2010 3:54:07 PM

Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/18/2008
Posts: 329
Location: Indiana, USA
Shadders wrote:
Hi,

OK, thanks. Will examine Ben Duncans work - i recall his pre-amp work from the late 80's or possible early 90's.

I am currently designing a DAC with sample rate converter - using a <1ps jitter clock generator - but having trouble finding a crystal that will produce the relevant frequency that is a multiple of 176.4kHz (44.1kHz multiple) for use with the clock generator. I am planning to use two clock generators - one for CD (44.1kHz) and the other for the USB input providing the usual 192kHz (48kHz multiple clock).

Regards,

Richard.


I still have one of his preamps from that period built by Audio Synthesis.
Shadders
Posted: Monday, April 12, 2010 7:27:05 PM

Rank: HIFI Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/7/2010
Posts: 6
Location: UK
Togil wrote:
dCS claim many thousands of coding hours spent on the development of their dacs.


Hi,

I was not going to use discrete components, just COTS DAC's and sample rate converter.

I may try to implement my own digital filters at some stage.

Regards,

Richard.
visualacoustics
Posted: Monday, April 12, 2010 11:31:15 PM


Rank: HIFI Novice
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/23/2010
Posts: 25
Location: UK/ENFIELD
hi all

Back to my views on diy loudspeakers,
The only reason why large scale manufacturers produce their own drive units (in my opinion) is cost, if you have the manufacturing facilities then cut out the middle man and build them yourself I'm sure it isn't difficult to 'copy' a proven design.
Take the atc sm75-150 mid unit, or should I say 'volt' mid range unit, or actually mid unit made for volt.....Who actually builds the things bearing in mind baffle mounting looks/dimensions are identical & the dome unit also looks the same. Why no copyright wrangling ??

As for build quality I do go some way to agree that factory is best, but I will say during a fairly loud session with some 'new' kef coda 8's a good few years back the plastic front baffles were left hanging by the wires when the odd dabs of glue simply wasn't enough-lets not forget the one electrolytic cap as crossover.
As for diy it's a fairly broad term, if all the components are factory produced & simply designed & assembled at home should they still be classed as diy, if they were assembled in a factory would they be any different.

Cabinet diy ?, maybe a few years ago you would have been restricted to a heavily braced rectangle cabinet but now there are many companies offering excellent cnc facilities at a very reasonable cost. Not quite the diy of years gone past.
I even mounted my 18'' Hawthorne OB units in a couple of 25mm thick 4ft x 2ft glass panels which I had water jet cut by a local company, it only took a phone call, sketch on some paper & some parting of cash. The outcome is certainly not diy in appearance..

For the diy reviews i fully understand that reviewers would be totally inundated by wannabe projects, so thats why I had a stand at the last whittlebury hall show but I was very disappointed not to receive one single visit from anybody from the trade or press, even if only to give a negative/positive passing comment.

I do think manufacturers have gone too far in stressing the finer points by way of selling their designs, especially regarding crossover phase correction , etc.
i was able to sit in on the active v passive atc demo at heathrow last month. the demo was based on the difference the active version had regarding the phase timing issue over the passive crossover, but while "everybody" in the room agreed the active was better 'cleaner sounding etc' i feel this had no relevance to the crossover as (if you bother to plot a chart over the whole seated floorpan area) you will see the timing only applies to one specific sweet spot and maybe one or two people only, everybody else would have heard a completely different phase relationship & taking wall reflections into account the whole thing soon will become a real mess.

I felt the whole test really brought back the "roots' of active design, independent amps no-intermodulation & short speaker cable runs, no volt drops giving a fast tight response especially in the bass region.
Basics which were never mentioned in the demo !
any comments anybody

mike
On a separate note it will be interesting what the results will be on the back to basic's testing by hi-fi plus, I just hope they are not influenced by the advertising & marketing provided by their patrons.



AV HEAVEN DON'T MESS AROUND /SCANSPEAK/ATC/VOLT FRONT END TWIN HAWTHORNE AUGIE 18'' OB ACTIVE SUBS
mat
Posted: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:38:46 AM

Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/12/2008
Posts: 312

As a designer of any product, you try your best to control the end result. That is you want your product to perform exactly the way you intended it to. During the design process you tie down every variable. On a high quality design you have you look at absolutely everything even the things that are not supposed to matter, you evaluate them and seek to control them both in the design and in production.

A part built design means you lose control of a major variable; the cabinet. The quality of which is often quoted as being responsible for 25% of the sound quality. Even if its built to a plan, its still a variable you can't tie down. Therefore a kit build is by definition a poorer product than a factory build.

Take the MDF, forgetting physical size, the variables are: Density, stiffness, wood type, wood source, density profile, type and amount of additives. That's all before you've lifted a saw!


kengale
Posted: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:46:13 AM

Rank: HIFI Veteran
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/25/2008
Posts: 529
Location: UK
visualacoustics wrote:


I do think manufacturers have gone too far in stressing the finer points by way of selling their designs, especially regarding crossover phase correction , etc.
i was able to sit in on the active v passive atc demo at heathrow last month. the demo was based on the difference the active version had regarding the phase timing issue over the passive crossover, but while "everybody" in the room agreed the active was better 'cleaner sounding etc' i feel this had no relevance to the crossover as (if you bother to plot a chart over the whole seated floorpan area) you will see the timing only applies to one specific sweet spot and maybe one or two people only, everybody else would have heard a completely different phase relationship & taking wall reflections into account the whole thing soon will become a real mess.

any comments anybody

mike



You have got lost here - as long as the distance between the two drive units is much less than a wavelength at the crossover frequency (and the manufacturers do their best to ensure that it is) then the phase relationship between the two will (amongst other things) affect the amplitude response over the crossover region, and this response will then apply over the whole seating area. It also affects the directionality (usually vertical) over the crossover region, sometimes quite drastically.
visualacoustics
Posted: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 8:15:47 PM


Rank: HIFI Novice
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/23/2010
Posts: 25
Location: UK/ENFIELD
I definitely may be thinking of a different area altogether.
I think I may have been confusing it with timing but thats another area altogether.
I totally agree about the phase relationship between the drivers at the crossover frequency but I didn't give it a thought as this was an area I presumed to be a basic design consideration and not an expensive crossover upgrade.
Nearly all loudspeaker manufacturers seem to advertise a flat response curve with or without any mention of phase compensation so is this just another excuse for some to justify a high end price for what should be a basic design consideration.
Again we are only talking about the addition of a few extra crossover components in the price after all.

On another note whats your views on the active principal, especially using an amp for every drive unit and active crossovers, this will bring me back to my original thoughts regarding the use of high grade drivers and high quality construction to produce an audiophile product.
Thanks mike.










AV HEAVEN DON'T MESS AROUND /SCANSPEAK/ATC/VOLT FRONT END TWIN HAWTHORNE AUGIE 18'' OB ACTIVE SUBS
kengale
Posted: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:22:26 PM

Rank: HIFI Veteran
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/25/2008
Posts: 529
Location: UK
visualacoustics wrote:

On another note whats your views on the active principal, especially using an amp for every drive unit and active crossovers, this will bring me back to my original thoughts regarding the use of high grade drivers and high quality construction to produce an audiophile product.
Thanks mike.


Well, as an ex-designer of active loudspeakers I am obviously pro, but you really haven't taken up the point of my and Mat's posts: a collection of high grade drivers and bits and pieces and high quality construction results in......... a collection of high grade drivers and bits and pieces. It doesn't result in a high quality design. The only thing that produces high quality design and performance is detailed research and development using suitable facilities, with all components, dimensions, materials chosen for their contribution to the whole and how they interact with the other ingredients - NOT chosen just because they are "high grade" or high cost. This takes a sound technical background, engineering know-how and experience, coupled with good business practice and the ability to implement proper purchasing and manufacturing quality control, followed by skilled correctly-targeted marketing. Plus a fair chunk of capital (development facilities, test equipment, production area, stock build-up, items for demonstration/review-loan, advertising literature, instruction manuals, packaging etc). Without all this you are doomed to commercial failure.
visualacoustics
Posted: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:00:27 PM


Rank: HIFI Novice
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/23/2010
Posts: 25
Location: UK/ENFIELD
hi ken
As a previous designer of active/pro audio speakers then you should be able to help when it comes to my concept of a high quality-dynamic cinema system.
I am still a little confused on where you are supposed to start with the design of a loudspeaker, if it's not the drivers or construction/application, and definitely not the crossover whats left.

To my design.
I wanted to produce a system which was able to produce high dynamics along with exceptional build quality & realistic 2-channel production.

So why the driver choice
As your area is pro audio then it shouldn't be a surprise with my driver choice and I won't go waffling on about their individual virtues.

Construction
The high quality concept of the upper baffle was to get the most from the mid & treble drivers, solid mounting & variable directional control ensure imaging and detailed reproduction.

The bass unit is always a problem area but as you will know the volt units are well controlled and very linear even at demanding levels, as for the bass enclosures (which i know do have a large effect in the overall sound) have been matched to the driver " volume wise " and are heavy damped internally & externally, also in-wall does have the benefit of a double glazed effect so any enclosure vibrations get a second chance of suppression before they meet the listener.

The crossover
Forgive me but I thought the job of the crossover had one job & one job only, to deliver a flat response across the audio spectrum, if this is achieved then why cant components be upgraded to clean the signal path further.
And for what I can see thats it.

So whats wrong with these concepts, what areas have I forgot to basically get started on a loudspeaker project and maybe we can go through them one by one.
Thanks mike.




AV HEAVEN DON'T MESS AROUND /SCANSPEAK/ATC/VOLT FRONT END TWIN HAWTHORNE AUGIE 18'' OB ACTIVE SUBS
kengale
Posted: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:39:03 PM

Rank: HIFI Veteran
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/25/2008
Posts: 529
Location: UK
visualacoustics wrote:
hi ken
As a previous designer of active/pro audio speakers then you should be able to help when it comes to my concept of a high quality-dynamic cinema system.
I am still a little confused on where you are supposed to start with the design of a loudspeaker, if it's not the drivers or construction/application, and definitely not the crossover whats left.

To my design.
I wanted to produce a system which was able to produce high dynamics along with exceptional build quality & realistic 2-channel production.

So why the driver choice
As your area is pro audio then it shouldn't be a surprise with my driver choice and I won't go waffling on about their individual virtues.

Construction
The high quality concept of the upper baffle was to get the most from the mid & treble drivers, solid mounting & variable directional control ensure imaging and detailed reproduction.

The bass unit is always a problem area but as you will know the volt units are well controlled and very linear even at demanding levels, as for the bass enclosures (which i know do have a large effect in the overall sound) have been matched to the driver " volume wise " and are heavy damped internally & externally, also in-wall does have the benefit of a double glazed effect so any enclosure vibrations get a second chance of suppression before they meet the listener.

The crossover
Forgive me but I thought the job of the crossover had one job & one job only, to deliver a flat response across the audio spectrum, if this is achieved then why cant components be upgraded to clean the signal path further.
And for what I can see thats it.

So whats wrong with these concepts, what areas have I forgot to basically get started on a loudspeaker project and maybe we can go through them one by one.
Thanks mike.




I really haven't got the time to hand-hold you through a complete design process, and you seem to be trying to get other people to donate to you for free skills and experience which has taken years of education and experience for us to to acquire. For example, if you really think that "the job of the crossover had one job & one job only, to deliver a flat response across the audio spectrum" then you've not even begun to graps the complexities of what it has to do, and how the choice of type (Bessel, Butterworth, chebychev..), order (1st, 2nd, 3rd ....) is tied up with the phase, amplitude and transient responses of the speaker units involved INCLUDING THEIR OUT-OF-BAND RESPONSES.
Have a play with http://astro.u-strasbg.fr/~koppen/radio/Activee.html and see if you understand what it is telling you about filter design. Implement a high-pass low-pass combination in a circuit simulation package (there are plenty for free) and and explore the phase and amplitude responses, both individually and in combination. You might then begin to grasp what the crossover has to do, and the effects of different choices.

Better still, get a job, no matter how menial, with a decent loudspeaker manufacturer and see first hand just how much is involved. You might then begin to get to grips with just how hopelessly over-simplified your view of the various concepts is.

Sorry to be so blunt - but I do wish you would read previous posts, both from me and others, IN DETAIL and take them to heart, rather than assume you can break into a highly specialised, technical and skilled market on the back of a few grossly simplified assumptions, hints from forum posters and the ability to pull old VW campers apart and put them back together again.

Regards

Ken
hifi addict
Posted: Thursday, April 29, 2010 12:32:51 PM


Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/26/2008
Posts: 277
Location: Hasting/Crete/London
It's all about marketing. If it looks pretty and doesn't kill anyone and passes all the legislation appropriate for the product, get it out there for people to listen to. Be positive don't give any hint's your a novice amateur, then you should sell something. There are a few loudspeaker products on the market built and designed by people who havn't really got a clue, but pass it off well.

As A said Marketing.
mat
Posted: Thursday, April 29, 2010 4:00:10 PM

Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/12/2008
Posts: 312
only a few???
hifi addict
Posted: Friday, April 30, 2010 10:00:26 AM


Rank: HIFI Guru
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/26/2008
Posts: 277
Location: Hasting/Crete/London
mat wrote:
only a few???


Quite.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

SoClean Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/29/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.158 seconds.